Are there any user reviews for the Cuisinart CJE-1000 Juice Extractor?

There are other juicers that leave reviewers and owners soundly unimpressed,This Cuisineart Model earns low scores at http://www.Amazon.com where many owners report that the too-short spout has a tendency to drip. They add that this lightweight juicer wobbles and walks across the counter during operation.!

There are two main types of juicers: citrus juicers and juice extractors. Citrus juicers -- essentially electric hand reamers -- are meant solely for citrus fruits like lemons, limes and oranges. The process is simple: You press the fruit onto the peak of a cone that spins, extracting the juice. Release the pressure and the machine stops.
That said, the best juicer reviews we found were not conducted in the United States. http://www.ConsumerReports.org for example, doesn't test juicers, and Cook's Illustrated tests only citrus juicers. Rather, the best reviews come from Australia's Choice magazine, New Zealand's Consumer magazine and Britain's Which? magazine. While the products in these reviews are not all available in the U.S., (mostly due to different electrical voltage and differing distribution), several models have U.S. equivalents. Editors at Which? magazine test 25 juicers with 600 oranges, 10 pineapples and more than 100 pounds of carrots. Choice details the good and bad of the 17 juicers it tested. New Zealand's Consumer magazine rigorously tests 11 juicers. There's a surprising amount of consensus in their results, too -- Breville juicers are rated highest in all three reviews. The Wall Street Journal offers a roundup review of manual and electric citrus juicers, but editors don't explain their testing process. An older 2003 review offers a better explanation of results. In the earlier review, testers compare five juicers ranging in price from $100 to $400. Although a test of five juicers doesn't do justice to the dozens on the market, the five chosen are mainstream models also covered in reviews from other sources. Two American publications -- Food & Wine and Good Housekeeping magazines -- recommend juicers without revealing how many juicers they tested or describing their methodology. We also read some helpful reviews at juicer retailers, such as http://www.VitalityPlus1.com http://www.877MyJuicer.com and http://www.Juicing.com. http://www.VitalityPlus1.com tests eight juicers with several pounds of carrots and spinach, and editors aren't afraid to downgrade juicers for excessive noise, vibration or poor juice output. Editors at http://www.877MyJuicer.com and http://www.Juicing.com point out which types of juicers are best for specific needs and critique individual models. Not surprisingly, less expensive juicers do not merit much mention on these sites, which is why we also evaluate review data from owners at http://www.Amazon.com http://www.Cooking.com http://www.Target.com and http://www.Epinions.com. Although it isn't a perfect indicator, owner opinion can really shed light on a juicer's performance in the real world, especially for models that aren't included in comparison tests. For example, the Jack LaLanne Power Juicer Classic JLPJB (*Est. $100) has a 3-inch-wide chute, which allows you to juice fruit without first chopping it into smaller pieces, and a powerful motor. Like many products sold via TV infomercials, this juicer gets mixed reviews. Numerous users at http://www.Amazon.com and http://www.Epinions.com say it can be difficult to clean by hand (though most of its components are dishwasher safe). Some owners complain that carrots and beets stain the white plastic housing, and the pulp isn't as dry as the infomercial claims. We also read complaints about overheating and breakage. Although the infomercial touts a lifetime guarantee, it applies only to the motor. The remaining parts are only covered for 90 days (most other juice extractors have at least a one-year warranty), and the warranty covers only the original purchaser. Despite these drawbacks, many owners believe that the Jack LaLanne juicer is a good entry-level juicer.